[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+ZOyah199Vsa9haepO=uizymy947aLv3tMoO=5ye=FHqhkYCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:44:01 +0800
From: Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>
To: Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com
Cc: zong.li@...ive.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
greentime.hu@...ive.com, ben.dooks@...ive.com, bp@...en8.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] soc: sifive: ccache: Rename SiFive L2 cache to
Composable cache.
<Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com> 於 2022年9月6日 週二 凌晨2:48寫道:
>
> Noticed a another thing, sorry..
>
> On 05/09/2022 09:31, Zong Li wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
> >
> > Since composable cache may be L3 cache if pL2 cache exists, we should use
> > its original name composable cache to prevent confusion.
> >
> > Apart from renaming, we also add the compatible "sifive,ccache0" into ID
> > table.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig | 6 +-
> > drivers/soc/sifive/Makefile | 2 +-
> > .../{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c} | 163 +++++++++---------
> > .../{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h} | 16 +-
> > 4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> > rename drivers/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c} (35%)
> > rename include/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h} (12%)
> >
>
> > -static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> > +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> > size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>
> You need to fix the alignment here as per checkpatch:
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #112: FILE: drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c:53:
> +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>
I'm not sure why I don't see that by checkpatch, but it looks that it
is actually misalignment there, I would re-check all indents in
source. Thanks.
> > {
> > unsigned int val;
> > @@ -57,75 +57,76 @@ static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> > if (kstrtouint_from_user(data, count, 0, &val))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > if ((val < 0xFF) || (val >= 0x10000 && val < 0x100FF))
> > - writel(val, l2_base + SIFIVE_L2_ECCINJECTERR);
> > + writel(val, ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_ECCINJECTERR);
> > else
> > return -EINVAL;
> > return count;
> > }
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists