[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxciDTgONtzwiiYo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 13:33:49 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
michael.roth@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
dgilbert@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v6 09/49] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP
fault for user address
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:25:10PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 06:55:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:03:43PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > > + pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
> > > +
> > > + /* If its large page then calculte the fault pfn */
> > > + if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> > > + unsigned long mask;
> > > +
> > > + mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1);
> > > + pfn |= (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & mask;
> >
> > Oh boy, this is unnecessarily complicated. Isn't this
> >
> > pfn |= pud_index(address);
> >
> > or
> > pfn |= pmd_index(address);
>
> I played with this a bit and ended up with
>
> pfn = pte_pfn(*pte) | PFN_DOWN(address & page_level_mask(level - 1));
>
> Unless I got something terribly wrong, this should do the
> same (see the attached patch) as the existing calculations.
IMHO a better name for this function would be do_user_rmp_addr_fault() as
it is more consistent with the existing function names.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists