linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iova: Remove some magazine pointer NULL checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3fa23318-6fa7-eba0-30b8-1fb71e6c327e@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 11:50:26 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>
CC:     <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iova: Remove some magazine pointer NULL checks

On 06/09/2022 10:28, Ethan Zhao wrote:

Hi Ethan,

>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/iova.c | 7 ++-----
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> index 47d1983dfa2a..580fdf669922 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
>> @@ -661,9 +661,6 @@ iova_magazine_free_pfns(struct iova_magazine *mag, 
>> struct iova_domain *iovad)
>>       unsigned long flags;
>>       int i;
>> -    if (!mag)
>> -        return;
>> -
> 
> iommu_probe_device
>    ops->probe_finalize(dev);
>      intel_iommu_probe_finalize
>         iommu_setup_dma_ops
>           iommu_dma_init_domain(domain, dma_base, dma_limit, dev)
>             iova_domain_init_rcaches
>               {
>               ...
>               cpu_rcache->loaded = iova_magazine_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
>               cpu_rcache->prev = iova_magazine_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
>             if (!cpu_rcache->loaded || !cpu_rcache->prev) {
>                  ret = -ENOMEM;
>                        goto out_err;
> 
> Do you mean iova_magazine_alloc() is impossible to fail ?

No, iova_magazine_alloc() may fail and return NULL. But if it does then 
we set iovad rcache pointer = NULL in the error path and don't use the 
rcache.

However we have a !iovad->rcache check on the "fast" alloc but not 
"insert". I need to check why that is again.

Thanks,
john