linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: temperature: mlx90632 Add runtime powermanagement modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcAhDPLyS=f07qVyiUY_Bh-ZrovWcajn2UkugQt=OCNNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:16:07 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: temperature: mlx90632 Add runtime
 powermanagement modes

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:04 PM Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 14:37, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 1:52 PM Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 12:21, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Very good and documented code, thanks!
> > > > I believe you better to use DEFINE_.*_PM_OPS instead of legacy ones
> > > > (due to pm_ptr() usage).
> > > > Otherwise, with some nitpicks that wouldn't prevent a green light,
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > I checked DEFINE_.*_PM_OPS usage around drivers and you either have
> > > SIMPLE (where you define suspend/resume) or you have RUNTIME (for
> > > runtime suspend/resume), but never are those two together. So I am a
> > > bit puzzled how to get this working.
> >
> > The one which suits here is called _DEFINE_DEV_PM_OPS(). But it's
> > basically the same what you put here with the possible unused case.
> >
> I thought underscore prefixed macros are the ones not to be used
> directly by drivers. I also found no occurrence in current drivers, so
> it was not something that was done so far?

Looks like... Okay, then let's leave it to the maintainer to decide.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko