[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4e24bcc-8974-f835-1d95-4b520413b011@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:27:45 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are
within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
On 9/5/22 14:40, James Clark wrote:
>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> @@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
>> /*
>> * ARM PMU hw_event flags
>> */
>> -/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT 1
>> -/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT 2
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT 0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT 0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> +
> Minor nit:
>
> I don't think changing the definitions to hex adds anything except more
> noise in the git blame.
The idea here was just to make these five digit hex, in accordance with
PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask like the existing x86 platform event flags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists