linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix repeated words in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADnq5_Ms18MHqyQVZ7UMQUCGGinzWtb5SkLubjSceOgrfJn+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:56:36 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel@...ll.ch, isabbasso@...eup.net,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix repeated words in comments

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-07 12:26, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> > Delete the redundant word 'we'.
>
> FWIW, to me it's not redundant because while indeed it is not correct,
> it looks exactly like the kind of typo I might make of "if we", and
> parsing it as *that* does make sense. The sentence you end up with here
> can hardly be considered an improvement since it is still ungrammatical
> nonsense.

Yes, I believe this was supposed to say "if we" rather than "we we".

Alex

>
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > index 02cb3a12dd76..6d6cc4637d41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, struct amdgpu_ib *ib,
> >    * @allocated: allocated a new handle?
> >    *
> >    * Validates the handle and return the found session index or -EINVAL
> > - * we we don't have another free session index.
> > + * we don't have another free session index.
> >    */
> >   static int amdgpu_vce_validate_handle(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
> >                                     uint32_t handle, uint32_t *allocated)