[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXyY_aGYW4R-PZvzG3FiTtHvLfS+s9bp_oCQUaRCGrcwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:47:57 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf test: Skip sigtrap test on old kernels
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 12:12 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> If it runs on an old kernel, perf_event_open would fail because of the
> new fields sigtrap and sig_data. Just skipping the test could miss an
> actual bug in the kernel.
>
> Let's check BTF if it has the perf_event_attr.sigtrap field.
>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> * move #include under #ifdef
> * return true when BPF is not supported
> * update comment
>
> tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c b/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> index e32ece90e164..cdf75eab6a8a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,48 @@ static struct perf_event_attr make_event_attr(void)
> return attr;
> }
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
> +#include <bpf/btf.h>
> +
> +static bool attr_has_sigtrap(void)
> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> + struct btf *btf;
> + const struct btf_type *t;
> + const struct btf_member *m;
> + const char *name;
> + int i, id;
> +
> + btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
> + if (btf == NULL) {
> + /* should be an old kernel */
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, "perf_event_attr", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
> + if (id < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
> + for (i = 0, m = btf_members(t); i < btf_vlen(t); i++, m++) {
> + name = btf__name_by_offset(btf, m->name_off);
> + if (!strcmp(name, "sigtrap")) {
> + ret = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +out:
> + btf__free(btf);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#else /* !HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
> +static bool attr_has_sigtrap(void)
> +{
> + /* to maintain current behavior */
nit: I don't think this comment will age well and the behavior of the
function is a bit counterintuitive. Perhaps:
/* If we don't have libbpf then guess we're on a newer kernel with
sigtrap support. This will mean the test will fail on older kernels.
*/
> + return true;
> +}
> +#endif /* HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
> +
> static void
> sigtrap_handler(int signum __maybe_unused, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext __maybe_unused)
> {
> @@ -139,7 +181,13 @@ static int test__sigtrap(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __m
>
> fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, perf_event_open_cloexec_flag());
> if (fd < 0) {
> - pr_debug("FAILED sys_perf_event_open(): %s\n", str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> + if (attr_has_sigtrap()) {
> + pr_debug("FAILED sys_perf_event_open(): %s\n",
> + str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> + } else {
> + pr_debug("perf_event_attr doesn't have sigtrap\n");
> + ret = TEST_SKIP;
> + }
> goto out_restore_sigaction;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists