[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxjBSxtoav7PQVei@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 18:05:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave.jiang@...el.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, a.manzanares@...sung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] memregion: Add arch_flush_memregion() interface
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:29:18PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 1abd5438f126..18463cb704fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,20 @@ void arch_invalidate_pmem(void *addr, size_t size)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_invalidate_pmem);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMREGION_INVALIDATE
> +bool arch_has_flush_memregion(void)
> +{
> + return !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR);
This looks really weird. Why does this need to care about HV at all?
Does that nfit stuff even run in guests?
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_has_flush_memregion);
...
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_flush_memregion);
Why aren't those exports _GPL?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists