linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] lib/find_bit: optimize find_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxjNeqLjGgRPIm+y@yury-laptop>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:57:30 -0700
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] lib/find_bit: optimize find_next_bit() functions

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:27:08PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 27/08/22 10:58, Yury Norov wrote:
> > +#define FIND_NEXT_BIT(FETCH, MUNGE, size, start)				\
> > +({										\
> > +	unsigned long mask, idx, tmp, sz = (size), __start = (start);		\
> > +										\
> > +	if (unlikely(__start >= sz))						\
> > +		goto out;							\
> > +										\
> > +	mask = MUNGE(BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(__start));				\
> > +	idx = __start / BITS_PER_LONG;						\
> > +										\
> > +	for (tmp = (FETCH) & mask; !tmp; tmp = (FETCH)) {			\
> > +		if (idx > sz / BITS_PER_LONG)					\
> 
> Does that want to be

Yes, I already fixed this.
 
>                 if (idx + 1 >= sz / BITS_PER_LONG)
> 
> ?
> 
> Consider this as used in _find_next_bit() for an all-zero 128-bit wide
> bitmap (two ULL's), providing the memory contiguous to the bitmap is also
> zero then this will only stop at idx=3, so that's fetching two ULLs too
> far.
> 
> > +			goto out;						\
> > +		idx++;								\
> > +	}									\
> > +										\
> > +	sz = min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __ffs(MUNGE(tmp)), sz);			\
> > +out:										\
> > +	sz;									\
> > +})