linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next,v2 00/22] refactor the walk and lookup hook functions in tc_action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxjUDwJ9/KAblwM3@pop-os.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:25:35 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, martin.lau@...ux.dev, daniel@...earbox.net,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
        song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2 00/22] refactor the walk and lookup hook
 functions in tc_action_ops

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:13:24PM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> The implementation logic of the walk/lookup hook function in each action
> module is the same. Therefore, the two functions can be reconstructed.
> When registering tc_action_ops of each action module, the corresponding
> net_id is saved to tc_action_ops. In this way, the net_id of the
> corresponding module can be directly obtained in act_api without executing
> the specific walk and lookup hook functions. Then, generic functions can
> be added to replace the walk and lookup hook functions of each action
> module. Last, modify each action module in alphabetical order. 
> 
> Reserve the walk and lookup interfaces and delete them when they are no 
> longer used.
> 
> This patchset has been tested by using TDC, and I will add selftest in
> other patchset.
> 
> ---
> v1: save the net_id of each TC action module to the tc_action_ops structure
> ---
> 
> Zhengchao Shao (22):
>   net: sched: act: move global static variable net_id to tc_action_ops
>   net: sched: act_api: implement generic walker and search for tc action
>   net: sched: act_bpf: get rid of tcf_bpf_walker and tcf_bpf_search
>   net: sched: act_connmark: get rid of tcf_connmark_walker and
>     tcf_connmark_search
>   net: sched: act_csum: get rid of tcf_csum_walker and tcf_csum_search
>   net: sched: act_ct: get rid of tcf_ct_walker and tcf_ct_search
>   net: sched: act_ctinfo: get rid of tcf_ctinfo_walker and
>     tcf_ctinfo_search
>   net: sched: act_gact: get rid of tcf_gact_walker and tcf_gact_search
>   net: sched: act_gate: get rid of tcf_gate_walker and tcf_gate_search
>   net: sched: act_ife: get rid of tcf_ife_walker and tcf_ife_search
>   net: sched: act_ipt: get rid of tcf_ipt_walker/tcf_xt_walker and
>     tcf_ipt_search/tcf_xt_search
>   net: sched: act_mirred: get rid of tcf_mirred_walker and
>     tcf_mirred_search
>   net: sched: act_mpls: get rid of tcf_mpls_walker and tcf_mpls_search
>   net: sched: act_nat: get rid of tcf_nat_walker and tcf_nat_search
>   net: sched: act_pedit: get rid of tcf_pedit_walker and
>     tcf_pedit_search
>   net: sched: act_police: get rid of tcf_police_walker and
>     tcf_police_search
>   net: sched: act_sample: get rid of tcf_sample_walker and
>     tcf_sample_search
>   net: sched: act_simple: get rid of tcf_simp_walker and tcf_simp_search
>   net: sched: act_skbedit: get rid of tcf_skbedit_walker and
>     tcf_skbedit_search
>   net: sched: act_skbmod: get rid of tcf_skbmod_walker and
>     tcf_skbmod_search
>   net: sched: act_tunnel_key: get rid of tunnel_key_walker and
>     tunnel_key_search
>   net: sched: act_vlan: get rid of tcf_vlan_walker and tcf_vlan_search
> 

I think it is easier to review if you can fold those removal patches
into one, pretty much like your 2nd patch. They are just cleanup's
following a same pattern.

Thanks.