[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxjYY6SJhp1PtZos@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:44:03 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] objtool, kcsan: Add volatile read/write
instrumentation to whitelist
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:43:32PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 19:42, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:39:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > Adds KCSAN's volatile barrier instrumentation to objtool's uaccess
> >
> > Confused. Are things like "__tsan_volatile_read4" considered as
> > "barrier" for KCSAN?
>
> No, it's what's emitted for READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE().
>
Thanks for clarification, then I guess better to remove the word
"barrier" in the commit log?
Regards,
Boqun
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists