[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPpSvWH7eV38NoPSdB0Qxov2cOsvYnSCCLy_vz4GQq3fA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 19:47:22 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] objtool, kcsan: Add volatile read/write
instrumentation to whitelist
On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 19:45, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:43:32PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 19:42, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:39:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > Adds KCSAN's volatile barrier instrumentation to objtool's uaccess
> > >
> > > Confused. Are things like "__tsan_volatile_read4" considered as
> > > "barrier" for KCSAN?
> >
> > No, it's what's emitted for READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE().
> >
>
> Thanks for clarification, then I guess better to remove the word
> "barrier" in the commit log?
Yes, that'd be best. (I think it was a copy/paste error.)
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists