[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfd6d40474d4d5f589a825b0cc193ae229c42d52.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:10:11 +0800
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<mingyuan.ma@...iatek.com>, <yf.wang@...iatek.com>,
<libo.kang@...iatek.com>, <chengci.xu@...iatek.com>,
<youlin.pei@...iatek.com>, <anan.sun@...iatek.com>,
<xueqi.zhang@...iatek.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of
mm_dts_parse
Hi Dan,
Thanks very much for your review:)
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 11:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the
> > i+1
> > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs.
> >
> > There are two places need to comment:
> > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole
> > the array in the error path.
> > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev-
> > >dev;"
> > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path.
> > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while
> > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path
> > in error
> > cases.
>
> I don't understand what you're saying here. There is still a
> platform_device_put(plarbdev) on the success path after
> component_match_add().
>
> So if we fail when i == 2 then we do:
>
> put_device(data->larb_imu[2].dev);
>
> But for the previous iterations has both platform_device_put()
> and put_device() called for them.
Sorry for this. Right! For the goto outside the loop, it did put twice.
I will fix this.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists