[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220907164400.759e2ee3@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 16:44:00 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Arun Easi <aeasi@...vell.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tracing: Fix compile error in trace_array calls
when TRACING is disabled
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 12:27:33 -0700
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
> On 9/7/22 11:57, Arun Easi wrote:
> > +#else /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> > +static inline int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +static inline int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Isn't it recommended to leave a blank line between function definitions?
Not really for stub functions in header files.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists