linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PM6125 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:27:47 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PM6125 PMIC

On 2022-08-08 12:17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2022 16:57, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > This PMIC is commonly used on boards with an SM6125 SoC and looks very
> > similar in layout to the PM6150.
> > 
> > Downstream declares more nodes to be available, but these have been
> > omitted from this patch: the pwm/lpg block is unused on my reference
> > device making it impossible to test/validate, and the spmi-clkdiv does
> > not have a single device-tree binding using this driver yet, hence
> > inclusion is better postponed until ie. audio which uses these clocks is
> > brought up.
> > 
> 
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.

I can respin the series with the suggested changes (and the iio patch
removed as that has now been applied), but note that all other PMIC dtsi
files as of -next today still carry the "wrong" adc-tm or gpios node
names.  Are there plans to patch those up too (if not already in a
series that I missed)?

- Marijn

> > +
> > +			xo-therm@4c {
> > +				reg = <ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU>;
> > +				qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +				qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>;
> > +				qcom,ratiometric;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		pm6125_adc_tm: adc-tm@...0 {
> 
> Generic node names, so either this is adc or thermal-sensor. Looks like
> thermal-sensor.
> 
> > +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5";
> > +			reg = <0x3500>;
> > +			interrupts = <0x0 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		pm6125_rtc: rtc@...0 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc";
> > +			reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>;
> > +			reg-names = "rtc", "alarm";
> > +			interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		pm6125_gpio: gpios@...0 {
> 
> s/gpios/gpio/
> 
> > +			compatible = "qcom,pm6125-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
> > +			reg = <0xc000>;
> > +			gpio-controller;
> > +			gpio-ranges = <&pm6125_gpio 0 0 9>;
> > +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +			interrupt-controller;
> > +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	pmic@1 {
> > +		compatible = "qcom,pm6125", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> > +		reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>;
> > +	};
> > +};
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof