linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] remoteproc/keystone: switch to using gpiod API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaDc1YwdS+Z4R1LEM=tzuMvCoy1qxWix-WaLRHsrZ=SUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:48:08 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] remoteproc/keystone: switch to using gpiod API

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:08 PM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

> This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to
> gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want to
> make private to gpiolib.
>
> Note that there is a behavior change in the driver: previously the
> driver did not actually request GPIO, it simply parsed GPIO number out
> of device tree and poked at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij