[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWVN4Fig5GEwyWwwUc9_iZyZ5rObTFkyNcuFp1GApy4tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 15:41:19 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...el.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] perf cpumap: Add range data encoding
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:30 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 5:39 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:33:53AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > + event = cpu_map_data__alloc(&syn_data, sizeof(struct perf_event_header));
> > > if (!event)
> > > return NULL;
> > >
> > > + syn_data.data = &event->data;
> > > event->header.type = PERF_RECORD_CPU_MAP;
> > > - event->header.size = size;
> > > - event->data.type = type;
> > > -
> > > - cpu_map_data__synthesize(&event->data, map, type, max);
> > > + event->header.size = syn_data.size;
> > > + cpu_map_data__synthesize(&syn_data);
> > > return event;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +
> > > int perf_event__synthesize_cpu_map(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > > const struct perf_cpu_map *map,
> > > perf_event__handler_t process,
> > > @@ -1891,24 +1894,20 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_event_update_name(struct perf_tool *tool, struct evse
> > > int perf_event__synthesize_event_update_cpus(struct perf_tool *tool, struct evsel *evsel,
> > > perf_event__handler_t process)
> > > {
> > > - size_t size = sizeof(struct perf_event_header) + sizeof(u64) + sizeof(u64);
> > > + struct synthesize_cpu_map_data syn_data = { .map = evsel->core.own_cpus };
> > > struct perf_record_event_update *ev;
> > > - int max, err;
> > > - u16 type;
> > > -
> > > - if (!evsel->core.own_cpus)
> > > - return 0;
> >
> > all seems fine, just looks like we no longer do this check,
> > might not be needed anymore, as that changed in past
>
> This function is called in a test and in this file. The caller already
> does this test and so the check is redundant plus a little confusing:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c?h=perf/core#n2062
> As you say, it wasn't needed any more and so I removed it.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
Would be nice to land this imo. Anything outstanding?
Thanks,
Ian
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> > > + int err;
> > >
> > > - ev = cpu_map_data__alloc(evsel->core.own_cpus, &size, &type, &max);
> > > + ev = cpu_map_data__alloc(&syn_data, sizeof(struct perf_event_header) + 2 * sizeof(u64));
> > > if (!ev)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > + syn_data.data = &ev->cpus.cpus;
> > > ev->header.type = PERF_RECORD_EVENT_UPDATE;
> > > - ev->header.size = (u16)size;
> > > + ev->header.size = (u16)syn_data.size;
> > > ev->type = PERF_EVENT_UPDATE__CPUS;
> > > ev->id = evsel->core.id[0];
> > > -
> > > - cpu_map_data__synthesize(&ev->cpus.cpus, evsel->core.own_cpus, type, max);
> > > + cpu_map_data__synthesize(&syn_data);
> > >
> > > err = process(tool, (union perf_event *)ev, NULL, NULL);
> > > free(ev);
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists