[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxgnOYWCSP7ormvK@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 07:08:09 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com, trix@...hat.com,
mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, phil.edworthy@...esas.com,
macro@...am.me.uk, johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal
<basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] fpga: dfl: Move the DFH definitions
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:04:23PM -0700, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /*
> * Driver Header File for FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) Support
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Intel Corporation, Inc.
I'm all for updated proper copyright dates, but in a patch that
_removes_ text from a file does not seem like the proper place for that,
right? Please discuss with your corporate lawyers as to how to do this
properly and when to do it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists