linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/107] 5.15.66-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yxgw6SrPaF43s/pw@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 07:49:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/107] 5.15.66-rc1 review

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:46:37PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:37 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.66 release.
> > There are 107 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:27:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> My test pipelines are still running, but x86_64 allmodconfig failed
> with gcc-12 with the error:
> 
> drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c: In function
> 'ipc_protocol_dl_td_process':
> drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:406:13: error: the
> comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'cb' will
> never be NULL [-Werror=address]
>   406 |         if (!IPC_CB(skb)) {
>       |             ^
> In file included from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.h:9,
>                  from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol.h:9,
>                  from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:6:
> ./include/linux/skbuff.h:794:33: note: 'cb' declared here
>   794 |         char                    cb[48] __aligned(8);
> 
> It will need dbbc7d04c549 ("net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check").

Thanks, I have not been testing any branches with gcc12 just yet because
of these issues :(