[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220907174535.4852e7da@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:45:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slab tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 20:05:44 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:37 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 12:53 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/6/22 08:51, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > After merging the slab tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/bpf/memalloc.c: In function 'bpf_mem_free':
> > > > kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:613:33: error: implicit declaration of function '__ksize'; did you mean 'ksize'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > 613 | idx = bpf_mem_cache_idx(__ksize(ptr - LLIST_NODE_SZ));
> > > > | ^~~~~~~
> > > > | ksize
> > >
> > > Could you use ksize() here? I'm guessing you picked __ksize() because
> > > kasan_unpoison_element() in mm/mempool.c did, but that's to avoid
> > > kasan_unpoison_range() in ksize() as this caller does it differently.
> > > AFAICS your function doesn't handle kasan differently, so ksize() should
> > > be fine.
> >
> > Ok. Will change to use ksize().
>
> Just pushed the following commit to address the issue:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=1e660f7ebe0ff6ac65ee0000280392d878630a67
>
> It will get to net-next soon.
I replaced my revert with that patch for today (and will discard that
when it arrives via some other tree).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists