[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ab7ecbb-d0fb-dc44-cada-fcdc5b9676d0@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 15:59:33 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: cleanup for SIS_PROP
On 9/1/22 10:03 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:11:07PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
>> The sched-domain of this cpu is only used when SIS_PROP is enabled,
>> and it should be irrelevant whether the local sd_llc is valid or
>> not, since all we care about is target sd_llc if !SIS_PROP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
>
> This could conceivably result in an uninitialised memory access if
> SIS_PROP was enabled while select_idle_cpu is running. I'm not sure if
> it can happen when jump labels are in use but I think it could happen
> for !CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL updating the sysctl_sched_features bitmap updated
> via sysctl.
>
> The patch is still a good idea because it moves an unlikely rcu_deference
> out of the default path for sched features but either this_sd needs to
> be initialised to NULL and checked or the this_sd lookup needs to happen
> twice at a slight additional cost to the default-disabled SIS_PROP path.
>
Hi Mel, please check the following resent patch, Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220902033032.79846-5-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists