[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220906215918.3fe20cca@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:59:18 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, jbaron@...mai.com, ardb@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arch/x86/kernel: check the return value of
insn_decode_kernel()
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:47:06 -0700
Li Zhong <floridsleeves@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -20,9 +20,10 @@
> int arch_jump_entry_size(struct jump_entry *entry)
> {
> struct insn insn = {};
> + int ret;
>
> - insn_decode_kernel(&insn, (void *)jump_entry_code(entry));
> - BUG_ON(insn.length != 2 && insn.length != 5);
> + ret = insn_decode_kernel(&insn, (void *)jump_entry_code(entry));
It's highly unlikely that length will be 2 or 5 if ret is not zero (as it
is initialized to zero going into this function).
> + BUG_ON(ret < 0 || insn.length != 2 && insn.length != 5);
In any case, you need parenthesis around the && condition.
-- Steve
>
> return insn.length;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists