linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/107] 5.15.66-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YxhkDs18QIxmc/qa@debian>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:27:42 +0100
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/107] 5.15.66-rc1 review


On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:49:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:46:37PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:37 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.66 release.
> > > There are 107 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:27:58 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > My test pipelines are still running, but x86_64 allmodconfig failed
> > with gcc-12 with the error:
> > 
> > drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c: In function
> > 'ipc_protocol_dl_td_process':
> > drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:406:13: error: the
> > comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'cb' will
> > never be NULL [-Werror=address]
> >   406 |         if (!IPC_CB(skb)) {
> >       |             ^
> > In file included from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.h:9,
> >                  from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol.h:9,
> >                  from drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:6:
> > ./include/linux/skbuff.h:794:33: note: 'cb' declared here
> >   794 |         char                    cb[48] __aligned(8);
> > 
> > It will need dbbc7d04c549 ("net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check").
> 
> Thanks, I have not been testing any branches with gcc12 just yet because
> of these issues :(

All the other arch I build are now ok with gcc-12, except x86_64.
I will make a complete list for x86_64 today and send you.

--
Regards
Sudip