lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxiqMbQlZJqxzu2q@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:26:57 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add missing update to max_mmu_rmap_size

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The update to statistic max_mmu_rmap_size is unintentionally removed by
> commit 4293ddb788c1 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant spte present check
> in mmu_set_spte"). Add missing update to it or max_mmu_rmap_size will
> always be nonsensical 0.
> 
> Fixes: 4293ddb788c1 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant spte present check in mmu_set_spte")

For anyone else wondering "how did so many reviewers miss this obvious bug?", the
answer is that the reviews were collected for v3 and earlier, and the mishandled
merge conflict only showed up in v4.

> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>


Paolo, do you want to grab this for 6.0?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ