[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxoGItJDTEjfctaS@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:11:30 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Harald Hoyer <harald@...fian.com>
Cc: ashish.kalra@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
ardb@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dgilbert@...hat.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com,
jarkko@...nel.org, jmattson@...gle.com, jroedel@...e.de,
kirill@...temov.name, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
marcorr@...gle.com, michael.roth@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, pgonda@...gle.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
slp@...hat.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, tobin@....com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vbabka@...e.cz, vkuznets@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [[PATCH for v6]] KVM: SEV: fix snp_launch_finish
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> The `params.auth_key_en` indicator does _not_ specify, whether an
> ID_AUTH struct should be sent or not, but, wheter the ID_AUTH struct
> contains an author key or not. The firmware always expects an ID_AUTH block.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1655761627.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com/
Please provide feedback by directly responding to whatever patch/email is buggy.
Or if that's too complicated for some reason (unlikely in this case), provide the
fixup patch to the author *off-list*.
> Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer <harald@...fian.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 85357dc4d231..5cf4be6a33ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -2242,17 +2242,18 @@ static int snp_launch_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>
> data->id_block_en = 1;
> data->id_block_paddr = __sme_pa(id_block);
> - }
>
> - if (params.auth_key_en) {
> id_auth = psp_copy_user_blob(params.id_auth_uaddr, KVM_SEV_SNP_ID_AUTH_SIZE);
> if (IS_ERR(id_auth)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(id_auth);
> goto e_free_id_block;
> }
>
> - data->auth_key_en = 1;
> data->id_auth_paddr = __sme_pa(id_auth);
> +
> + if (params.auth_key_en) {
While I'm here though... Single line if-statements don't need curly braces.
> + data->auth_key_en = 1;
> + }
> }
>
> data->gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
> --
> 2.37.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists