[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c30cc112-0fb8-01e6-1bb8-eed7db0b9049@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:15:44 +0000
From: <Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
<radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>, <admin@...iphile.com>,
<Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>, <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: Add
SAM9260 compatibles to SAM9x60
On 08.09.2022 15:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 15:55, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>> Add the AT91SAM9260 serial compatibles to the list of SAM9X60 compatibles
>> in order to highlight the incremental characteristics of the SAM9X60
>> serial IP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Nothing, this patch was not here before
>>
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>> index b25535b7a4d2..4d80006963c7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ properties:
>> - items:
>> - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
>> - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
>> + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
>> + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>
> This is weird. You say in commit msg to "highlight the incremental
> characteristics" but you basically change here existing compatibles.
Does "show that they are incremental IP's" sound better then?
> This is not enum, but a list.
>
What do you mean by this? I know it is a list, I specified so in the
commit message.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Regards,
Sergiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists