[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220908172448.208585-2-jlayton@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:24:41 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, djwong@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com, trondmy@...merspace.com, neilb@...e.de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, xiubli@...hat.com,
chuck.lever@...cle.com, lczerner@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
bfields@...ldses.org, brauner@...nel.org, fweimer@...hat.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] iversion: clarify when the i_version counter must be updated
The i_version field in the kernel has had different semantics over
the decades, but NFSv4 has certain expectations. Update the comments
in iversion.h to describe when the i_version must change.
Cc: Colin Walters <walters@...bum.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/166086932784.5425.17134712694961326033@noble.neil.brown.name/#t
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/iversion.h | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/iversion.h b/include/linux/iversion.h
index 3bfebde5a1a6..0555a3851dbf 100644
--- a/include/linux/iversion.h
+++ b/include/linux/iversion.h
@@ -9,8 +9,14 @@
* ---------------------------
* The change attribute (i_version) is mandated by NFSv4 and is mostly for
* knfsd, but is also used for other purposes (e.g. IMA). The i_version must
- * appear different to observers if there was a change to the inode's data or
- * metadata since it was last queried.
+ * appear larger to observers if there was an explicit change to the inode's
+ * data or metadata since it was last queried.
+ *
+ * An explicit change is one that would ordinarily result in a change to the
+ * inode status change time (aka ctime). i_version must appear to change, even
+ * if the ctime does not (since the whole point is to avoid missing updates due
+ * to timestamp granularity). If POSIX mandates that the ctime must change due
+ * to an operation, then the i_version counter must be incremented as well.
*
* Observers see the i_version as a 64-bit number that never decreases. If it
* remains the same since it was last checked, then nothing has changed in the
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists