[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxormF55DRW6oGgN@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 20:51:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com,
basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...el.com, trix@...hat.com,
mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianfei.zhang@...el.com, corbet@....net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, phil.edworthy@...esas.com,
macro@...am.me.uk, johan@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] fpga: dfl: add generic support for MSIX interrupts
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:34:07AM -0700, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:37:32PM -0700, matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com wrote:
...
> > This one tends to be expanded in the future, so I would keep it switch case.
>
> I'm okay with using the switch statement, but how about the following?
>
> switch (FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, readq(base))) {
> case 1:
> ...
> break;
> }
Fine to me.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists