[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220908195111.813208840@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 16:29:03 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Prasad Pandit <ppandit@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/7] clockevent unbind: use smp_call_func_single_fail
Convert clockevents_unbind from smp_call_function_single
to smp_call_func_single_fail, which will fail in case
the target CPU is tagged as block interference CPU.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/clockevents.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/clockevents.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
#include "tick-internal.h"
@@ -416,9 +417,14 @@ static void __clockevents_unbind(void *a
*/
static int clockevents_unbind(struct clock_event_device *ced, int cpu)
{
+ int ret;
struct ce_unbind cu = { .ce = ced, .res = -ENODEV };
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, __clockevents_unbind, &cu, 1);
+ block_interf_read_lock();
+ ret = smp_call_func_single_fail(cpu, __clockevents_unbind, &cu, 1);
+ block_interf_read_unlock();
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
return cu.res;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists