[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3658630.1662669081@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 21:31:21 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vfs, security: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing NFS sb sharing
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org> wrote:
> > + fc->lsm_set = true;
>
> I was wondering if there is any way to have security_sb_set_mnt_opts()
> or security_sb_clone_mnt_opts() set this value automatically? A quick
> "git-grep" for security_sb_set_mnt_opts() shows that it's also called
> by btrfs at some point, so having this done automatically feels less
> fragile to me than requiring individual filesystems to set it
> manually.
Hmmm... I wonder if cifs and afs should be calling
security_sb_clone_mnt_opts() also.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists