[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877d782d-8fb1-44bc-6de9-1c3c7f8667f3@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:02:47 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
avri.altman@....com, mani@...nel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] ufs: core: mcq: Adds Multi-Circular Queue
support
On 9/5/22 09:27, Bean Huo wrote:
> static read_queues is not initialized.
Hi Bean,
The Linux kernel coding style guide does not allow to explicitly
initialize static variables to zero. The C standard requires that static
variables that are not initialized explicitly are initialized to zero.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.bss: "In C, statically allocated
objects without an explicit initializer are initialized to zero (for
arithmetic types) or a null pointer (for pointer types)."
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists