[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yxp6kqvB5wzJCEYQ@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 02:28:18 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/sgx: Add SGX selftest
augment_via_eaccept_long
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:44:29PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Jarkko and Vijay,
>
> On 9/4/2022 7:04 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
> >
> > Add a new test case which is same as augment_via_eaccept but adds a
> > larger number of EPC pages to stress test EAUG via EACCEPT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > index 78c3b913ce10..e596b45bc5f8 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c
> > @@ -22,8 +22,10 @@
> > #include "main.h"
> >
> > static const size_t ENCL_HEAP_SIZE_DEFAULT = PAGE_SIZE;
> > +static const unsigned long TIMEOUT_DEFAULT = 900;
>
> I am not sure about the naming here ... it is _very_ close to
> (and thus appears to be in the same namespace as)
> TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT from the included kselftest_harness.h.
>
> This is surely a nitpick but how about SGX_TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT?
Agreed, I would use ENCL_TEST_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT (better match
with existing names).
>
> > static const uint64_t MAGIC = 0x1122334455667788ULL;
> > static const uint64_t MAGIC2 = 0x8877665544332211ULL;
> > +
>
> There is an extra empty line here ... but it looks like intended code
> organization?
Yeah, I think it'd make sense to have it there and would
not be productive to make it a separate patch.
>
> > vdso_sgx_enter_enclave_t vdso_sgx_enter_enclave;
> >
> > /*
>
>
> Apart from the naming comment this addition looks good.
>
> This is a valuable addition to the SGX tests.
>
> Reinette
Thank you.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists