[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49f7bb67-2f4f-8e06-5420-5b279fdf3199@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:53:18 -0700
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
driver
Hi Dave/Greg,
On 9/7/22 10:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:27:20PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * Per TDX Module 1.0 specification, section titled
>> + * "TDG.MR.REPORT", REPORTDATA length is fixed as
>> + * TDX_REPORTDATA_LEN, TDREPORT length is fixed as
>> + * TDX_REPORT_LEN, and TDREPORT subtype is fixed as
>> + * 0. Also check for valid user pointers.
>> + */
>> + if (!req.reportdata || !req.tdreport || req.subtype ||
>> + req.rpd_len != TDX_REPORTDATA_LEN ||
>> + req.tdr_len != TDX_REPORT_LEN)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> You never verify that your reserved[7] fields are actually set to 0,
> which means you can never use them in the future :(
>
> Please fix that up, thanks.
Would you prefer a new posting (v12.1 or v13) with this change, or do you
want to continue the review in the same version?
>
> greg k-h
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists