[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yxl8tbJERqrmsgpU@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:25:09 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@...ora.tech>,
Ken Goldman <kgold@...ux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...gle.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: TPM: hibernate with IMA PCR 10
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:57:27PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 13:47 -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 7:48 PM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:51:50PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:45 PM Ken Goldman <kgold@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/4/2022 7:20 PM, Evan Green wrote:
> > > > > > Enabling the kernel to be able to do encryption and integrity checks on
> > > > > > the hibernate image prevents a malicious userspace from escalating to
> > > > > > kernel execution via hibernation resume. [snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a related question.
> > > > >
> > > > > When a TPM powers up from hibernation, PCR 10 is reset. When a
> > > > > hibernate image is restored:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Is there a design for how PCR 10 is restored?
> > > >
> > > > I don't see anything that does that at present.
> > > >
> > > > > 2. How are /sys/kernel/security/ima/[pseudofiles] saved and
> > > > > restored?
> > > >
> > > > They're part of the running kernel state, so should re-appear without
> > > > any special casing. However, in the absence of anything repopulating
> > > > PCR 10, they'll no longer match the in-TPM value.
> > >
> > > This feature could still be supported, if IMA is disabled
> > > in the kernel configuration, which I see a non-issue as
> > > long as config flag checks are there.
> >
> > Right, from what I understand about IMA, the TPM's PCR getting out of
> > sync with the in-kernel measurement list across a hibernate (because
> > TPM is reset) or kexec() (because in-memory list gets reset) is
> > already a problem. This series doesn't really address that, in that it
> > doesn't really make that situation better or worse.
>
> For kexec, the PCRs are not reset, so the IMA measurment list needs to
> be carried across kexec and restored. This is now being done on most
> architectures. Afterwards, the IMA measurement list does match the
> PCRs.
>
> Hibernation introduces a different situation, where the the PCRs are
> reset, but the measurement list is restored, resulting in their not
> matching.
As I said earlier the feature still can be supported if
kernel does not use IMA but obviously needs to be flagged.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists