linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: syscon-reboot: Add priority property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37b21772-c128-36bb-dbc1-5047b2a82773@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:26:48 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: reset: syscon-reboot: Add priority
 property

On 07/09/2022 18:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2022 14:38:42 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 31/08/2022 10:17, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> This new optional priority property allows to specify custom priority level
>>> of reset device. Prior this change priority level was hardcoded to 192 and
>>> not possible to specify or change. Specifying other value is needed for
>>> some boards. Default level when not specified stays at 192 as before.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
>>
>> Thanks for the changes. Explanation looks good.
>>
>> I sent a patch adding the common schema with priority. If it gets
>> ack/review from Rob and Sebastian, please kindly rebase on top of it and
>> use same way as I did for gpio-restart.yaml
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> Ok, so just by adding "allOf: - $ref: restart-handler.yaml#" right?

Yes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof