| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202209081717.00OiPpzm-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:23:49 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, peterz@...radead.org,
acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/7] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver
Hi Anshuman,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on acme/perf/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core arm64/for-next/core linus/master v6.0-rc4 next-20220907]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220908-131425
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
config: arm64-buildonly-randconfig-r002-20220907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220908/202209081717.00OiPpzm-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/5b70e42a715860504646cb5bd1788ddb823dd50b
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anshuman-Khandual/arm64-perf-Enable-branch-stack-sampling/20220908-131425
git checkout 5b70e42a715860504646cb5bd1788ddb823dd50b
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/perf/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c: In function 'brbe_fetch_perf_type':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:251:24: error: 'PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT' undeclared (first use in this function)
251 | return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:251:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:253:24: error: 'PERF_BR_SERROR' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_BR_ERET'?
253 | return PERF_BR_SERROR;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_BR_ERET
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:256:24: error: 'PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST' undeclared (first use in this function)
256 | return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:259:24: error: 'PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function)
259 | return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:262:24: error: 'PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN' undeclared (first use in this function)
262 | return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:265:24: error: 'PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST' undeclared (first use in this function)
265 | return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:268:24: error: 'PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function)
268 | return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:271:24: error: 'PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX'?
271 | return PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:274:24: error: 'PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT' undeclared (first use in this function)
274 | return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c: In function 'brbe_fetch_perf_priv':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:287:23: error: 'PERF_BR_PRIV_USER' undeclared (first use in this function)
287 | return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:289:23: error: 'PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_SECURITY_KERNEL'?
289 | return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| PERF_SECURITY_KERNEL
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:293:23: error: 'PERF_BR_PRIV_HV' undeclared (first use in this function)
293 | return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c: In function 'capture_brbe_flags':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:306:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'branch_sample_no_cycles' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
306 | if (!branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:309:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'branch_sample_type' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
309 | if (branch_sample_type(event)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:312:56: error: 'PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI' undeclared (first use in this function)
312 | cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:313:48: error: 'struct perf_branch_entry' has no member named 'new_type'
313 | cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].new_type = branch_type;
| ^
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:319:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'branch_sample_no_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
319 | if (!branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:341:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'branch_sample_priv' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
341 | if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:347:48: error: 'struct perf_branch_entry' has no member named 'priv'
347 | cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
| ^
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c: In function 'brbe_fetch_perf_type':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:250:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
250 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:252:9: note: here
252 | case BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:255:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
255 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:257:9: note: here
257 | case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:258:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
258 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:260:9: note: here
260 | case BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:261:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
261 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:263:9: note: here
263 | case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:264:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
264 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:266:9: note: here
266 | case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:267:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
267 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:269:9: note: here
269 | case BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:270:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
270 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:272:9: note: here
272 | case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT:
| ^~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:273:34: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
273 | *new_branch_type = true;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c:275:9: note: here
275 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT +251 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_brbe.c
222
223 static int brbe_fetch_perf_type(u64 brbinf, bool *new_branch_type)
224 {
225 int brbe_type = brbe_fetch_type(brbinf);
226 *new_branch_type = false;
227
228 switch (brbe_type) {
229 case BRBINF_TYPE_UNCOND_DIR:
230 return PERF_BR_UNCOND;
231 case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR:
232 return PERF_BR_IND;
233 case BRBINF_TYPE_DIR_LINK:
234 return PERF_BR_CALL;
235 case BRBINF_TYPE_INDIR_LINK:
236 return PERF_BR_IND_CALL;
237 case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_SUB:
238 return PERF_BR_RET;
239 case BRBINF_TYPE_COND_DIR:
240 return PERF_BR_COND;
241 case BRBINF_TYPE_CALL:
242 return PERF_BR_CALL;
243 case BRBINF_TYPE_TRAP:
244 return PERF_BR_SYSCALL;
245 case BRBINF_TYPE_RET_EXCPT:
246 return PERF_BR_ERET;
247 case BRBINF_TYPE_IRQ:
248 return PERF_BR_IRQ;
249 case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_HALT:
> 250 *new_branch_type = true;
> 251 return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT;
252 case BRBINF_TYPE_SERROR:
> 253 return PERF_BR_SERROR;
254 case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_DEBUG:
255 *new_branch_type = true;
> 256 return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST;
257 case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_DEBUG:
258 *new_branch_type = true;
> 259 return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA;
260 case BRBINF_TYPE_ALGN_FAULT:
261 *new_branch_type = true;
> 262 return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN;
263 case BRBINF_TYPE_INST_FAULT:
264 *new_branch_type = true;
> 265 return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST;
266 case BRBINF_TYPE_DATA_FAULT:
267 *new_branch_type = true;
> 268 return PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA;
269 case BRBINF_TYPE_FIQ:
270 *new_branch_type = true;
> 271 return PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ;
272 case BRBINF_TYPE_DEBUG_EXIT:
273 *new_branch_type = true;
> 274 return PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT;
275 default:
276 pr_warn("unknown branch type captured\n");
277 return PERF_BR_UNKNOWN;
278 }
279 }
280
281 static int brbe_fetch_perf_priv(u64 brbinf)
282 {
283 int brbe_el = brbe_fetch_el(brbinf);
284
285 switch (brbe_el) {
286 case BRBINF_EL_EL0:
> 287 return PERF_BR_PRIV_USER;
288 case BRBINF_EL_EL1:
> 289 return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
290 case BRBINF_EL_EL2:
291 if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
292 return PERF_BR_PRIV_KERNEL;
> 293 return PERF_BR_PRIV_HV;
294 default:
295 pr_warn("unknown branch privilege captured\n");
296 return -1;
297 }
298 }
299
300 static void capture_brbe_flags(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
301 u64 brbinf, int idx)
302 {
303 int branch_type, type = brbe_record_valid(brbinf);
304 bool new_branch_type;
305
> 306 if (!branch_sample_no_cycles(event))
307 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].cycles = brbe_fetch_cycles(brbinf);
308
> 309 if (branch_sample_type(event)) {
310 branch_type = brbe_fetch_perf_type(brbinf, &new_branch_type);
311 if (new_branch_type) {
> 312 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI;
> 313 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].new_type = branch_type;
314 } else {
315 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].type = branch_type;
316 }
317 }
318
> 319 if (!branch_sample_no_flags(event)) {
320 /*
321 * BRBINF_LASTFAILED does not indicate that the last transaction
322 * got failed or aborted during the current branch record itself.
323 * Rather, this indicates that all the branch records which were
324 * in transaction until the curret branch record have failed. So
325 * the entire BRBE buffer needs to be processed later on to find
326 * all branch records which might have failed.
327 */
328 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].abort = brbinf & BRBINF_LASTFAILED;
329
330 /*
331 * All these information (i.e transaction state and mispredicts)
332 * are not available for target only branch records.
333 */
334 if (type != BRBINF_VALID_TARGET) {
335 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].mispred = brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED;
336 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].predicted = !(brbinf & BRBINF_MPRED);
337 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].in_tx = brbinf & BRBINF_TX;
338 }
339 }
340
> 341 if (branch_sample_priv(event)) {
342 /*
343 * All these information (i.e branch privilege level) are not
344 * available for source only branch records.
345 */
346 if (type != BRBINF_VALID_SOURCE)
> 347 cpuc->brbe_entries[idx].priv = brbe_fetch_perf_priv(brbinf);
348 }
349 }
350
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists