[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220908093330.lzynnuqlnvppj27q@quack3>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:33:30 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, osandov@...com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sbitmap: fix possible io hung due to lost wakeup
On Wed 07-09-22 12:20:09, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 06:41:50PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 07-09-22 08:13:40, Keith Busch wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure about this part. We've already decremented, so the freed bit is
> > > accounted for against the batch. Returning true here may double-count the freed
> > > bit, right?
> >
> > Yes, we may wake up waiters unnecessarily frequently. But that's a
> > performance issue at worst and only if it happens frequently. So I don't
> > think it matters in practice (famous last words ;).
>
> Ok, let's go with that. Do you want to send the patch? I have a follow-up fix
> for batched tagging that depends on this.
I think Kuai will do that. But if not, I can certainly take his patch and
resubmit it with the fixup.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists