linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276F93044F557D1473D7FCF8C409@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:54:18 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        "marcan@...can.st" <marcan@...can.st>,
        "sven@...npeter.dev" <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        "alyssa@...enzweig.io" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        "robdclark@...il.com" <robdclark@...il.com>,
        "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com" <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "orsonzhai@...il.com" <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        "baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
        "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com" 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        "thunder.leizhen@...wei.com" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        "christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "yangyingliang@...wei.com" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        "jon@...id-run.com" <jon@...id-run.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "asahi@...ts.linux.dev" <asahi@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain
 and device/group

> From: Tian, Kevin
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 5:31 PM
> > This mixture of error codes is the basic reason why a new code was
> > used, because none of the existing codes are used with any
> > consistency.
> 
> btw I saw the policy for -EBUSY is also not consistent in this series.
> 
> while it's correct to change -EBUSY to -EMEDIUMTYPE for omap, assuming
> that retrying another fresh domain for the said device should work:
> 
> 	if (omap_domain->dev) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "iommu domain is already attached\n");
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		ret = -EMEDIUMTYPE;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> the change in tegra-gart doesn't sound correct:
> 
> 	if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) {
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		ret = -EMEDIUMTYPE;
> 
> one device cannot be attached to two domains. This fact doesn't change
> no matter how many domains are tried. In concept this check is
> redundant and should have been done by iommu core, but obviously we
> didn't pay attention to what -EBUSY actually represents in this path.
> 

oops. Above is actually a right retry condition. gart is iommu instead of
device. So in concept retrying gart->active_domain for the device could
work.

So please ignore this comment.