[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yxm/EyW1upzPUZuH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:08:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kprobes: Fix kprobes instruction boudary
check with CONFIG_RETHUNK
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:30:41AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Once that lands the rules are:
>
> 0-5 INT3 after RET, !CONFIG_RETHUNK && !CONFIG_SLS: 0
> CONFIG_SLS: 1
> CONFIG_RETHUNK: 4-5 depending on compiler version
>
> 0-1 INT3 after RET: !CONFIG_SLS: 0
> CONFIG_SLS: 0-1 depending on compiler version
>
> Now, given we know the compiler version at build time, this could be
> determined and used in kprobes, but meh.
Oh also, for giggles, we have a number of sites that have ret;int3
independent of CONFIG_SLS because that was easier than figuring out what
all should be done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists