[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY5sOz6a1P23f2hs8UL__O2cBtDdMcHt1nxSX59ZOBzaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:06:13 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: gpio: pca95xx: add entry for pcal6534
and PI4IOE5V6534Q
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:34 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> If you have specific+fallback compatible (e.g. diodes,pi4ioe5v6534q,
> nxp,pcal6534), you can always introduce changes in the driver because it
> will match to the specific one (diodes). You could even introduce
> incompatible changes, if you insist, and the effect would be the same as
> adding now two compatibles in the driver.
I know, what I mean is that this binding should probably have fallback
compatibles for the TI, Exar, Onnn and Maxim compatibles listed in
the bindings, I bet they are all compatible with some nxp,pcaNNNN.
We could fix that, perhaps.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists