[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbb3a411-0e41-6d67-bb66-d21627fff90e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:26:54 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for
memblock_alloc_try_nid*
On 04.09.22 06:21, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
> where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
> Additionally, two of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are
> run for both top-down and bottom-up allocation directions.
>
> The tested scenarios are:
>
> Range unrestricted:
> - region cannot be allocated:
> + none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region
>
> Range restricted:
> - region can be allocated in the specific node requested without dropping
> min_addr:
> + the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent
> reserved regions
> - region cannot be allocated:
> + nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the region,
> but the range is split between two nodes and everything else is
> reserved
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 197 insertions(+)
>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists