[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yxnh87ZIS2JwvN7D@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:37:07 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:39:07AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> I am not totally clear about remaining 'struct device *dev;' in
> >> vfio_device struct. I see it used in some places. Is it supposed to
> >> disappear at some point?
> >
> > no, Eric. *dev will not disappear, it stores the dev pointet passed in by
> > caller of vfio_init_device().
>
> yeah I see but you have device->device.parent = device->dev;
IIRC we have a number of these redundancies now, often the drivers
store another copy of the dev too.
A significant use of dev is for printing things, what should be done
here is to create a subsystem wide vfio_warn/etc that takes in the
vfio_device, and then print properly from there. Now that we have a
struct device all the prints should also include the VFIO struct
device name, and then the PCI device perhaps in brackets.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists