[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gQqyFZHxe9fLX9WrMGBYhdna7Cpnx6bwTPFffy_koE5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:04:51 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] PCI/ACPI: Link host bridge to its ACPI fw node
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:17 AM Robert Richter <rrichter@....com> wrote:
>
> A lookup of a host bridge's corresponding acpi device (struct
> acpi_device) is not possible, for example:
>
> adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&host_bridge->dev);
Hmm.
x86 has this code in pcibios_root_bridge_prepare():
if (!bridge->dev.parent) {
struct pci_sysdata *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata;
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion);
}
which should set the ACPI companion for the host bridge.
Moreover, on my x86 desktop /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/ (which is the
host bridge AFAICS) has
firmware_node -> ../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00
so clearly the ACPI companion is there.
Are we talking about ARM64 here?
> This could be useful to find a host bridge's fwnode handle and to
> determine and call additional host bridge ACPI parameters and methods
> such as HID/CID or _UID.
>
> Make this work by linking the host bridge to its ACPI fw node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index d57cf8454b93..846c979e4c29 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> goto out_release_info;
>
> host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
> + host_bridge->dev.fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(device);
So this would be replacing the existing mechanism on x86, right?
> if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
> if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists