[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yxnt9uQTmbqul5lf@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:28:22 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, marcan@...can.st,
sven@...npeter.dev, alyssa@...enzweig.io, robdclark@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
orsonzhai@...il.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
zhang.lyra@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, jean-philippe@...aro.org, cohuck@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, jon@...id-run.com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible
domain and device/group
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:10:33PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Sure, rust has all sorts of nice things. But the kernel doesn't follow
> rust idioms, and I don't think this is a great place to start
> experimenting with them.
It is actually a great place to start experimenting. The IOMMU
interfaces are rather domain specific and if we get something wrong the
damage is limited to a few callers. There are APIs much more exposed in
the kernel which would be worse for that.
But anyway, I am not insisting on it.
> It has been 3 months since EMEDIUMTYPE was first proposed and 6
> iterations of the series, don't you think it is a bit late in the game
> to try to experiment with rust error handling idioms?
If I am not mistaken, I am the person who gets blamed when crappy IOMMU
code is sent upstream. So it is also up to me to decide in which state
and how close to merging a given patch series is an whether it is
already 'late in the game'.
> So, again, would you be happy with a simple
>
> #define IOMMU_EINCOMPATIBLE_DEVICE xx
>
> to make it less "re-using random error codes"?
I am wondering if this can be solved by better defining what the return
codes mean and adjust the call-back functions to match the definition.
Something like:
-ENODEV : Device not mapped my an IOMMU
-EBUSY : Device attached and domain can not be changed
-EINVAL : Device and domain are incompatible
...
That would be much more intuitive than using something obscure like
EMEDIUMTYPE.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists