linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mellanox/mlxsw: fix repeated words in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f76d0607-4753-3131-3b09-9d2ef4b3a60f@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:57:58 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>, idosch@...dia.com,
        petrm@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mellanox/mlxsw: fix repeated words in comments



On 9/8/22 05:43, wangjianli wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'in'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjianli@...rlc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
> index 2c4443c6b964..48f1fa62a4fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
> @@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ void mlxsw_sp_ipip_entry_demote_tunnel(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
>  /* The configuration where several tunnels have the same local address in the
>   * same underlay table needs special treatment in the HW. That is currently not
>   * implemented in the driver. This function finds and demotes the first tunnel
> - * with a given source address, except the one passed in in the argument
> + * with a given source address, except the one passed in the argument

Yeah, either way is OK.

>   * `except'.
>   */
>  bool

-- 
~Randy