[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <712acfd4-f7f4-457e-f1a2-ca0f076c6d24@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:52:25 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/shuffle: convert module_param_call to module_param_cb
On 09.09.22 10:39, Liu Shixin wrote:
> module_param_call is now completely consistent with module_param_cb, so
> there is no need to keep two macros. Convert module_param_call to
> module_param_cb since former is obsolete and latter is more kernel-ish.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/shuffle.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shuffle.c b/mm/shuffle.c
> index c13c33b247e8..fb1393b8b3a9 100644
> --- a/mm/shuffle.c
> +++ b/mm/shuffle.c
> @@ -12,23 +12,22 @@
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(page_alloc_shuffle_key);
>
> static bool shuffle_param;
> -static int shuffle_show(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> -{
> - return sprintf(buffer, "%c\n", shuffle_param ? 'Y' : 'N');
> -}
>
> -static __meminit int shuffle_store(const char *val,
> +static __meminit int shuffle_param_set(const char *val,
> const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> - int rc = param_set_bool(val, kp);
> -
> - if (rc < 0)
> - return rc;
> - if (shuffle_param)
> + if (param_set_bool(val, kp))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (*(bool *)kp->arg)
> static_branch_enable(&page_alloc_shuffle_key);
> return 0;
> }
> -module_param_call(shuffle, shuffle_store, shuffle_show, &shuffle_param, 0400);
> +
> +static const struct kernel_param_ops shuffle_param_ops = {
> + .set = shuffle_param_set,
> + .get = param_get_bool,
> +};
> +module_param_cb(shuffle, &shuffle_param_ops, &shuffle_param, 0400);
>
> /*
> * For two pages to be swapped in the shuffle, they must be free (on a
LGTM
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists