[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b19f1b0-0916-9fe7-99a4-33d0c626b7c3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 19:58:37 +0200
From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] use memset to make code clearer
On 9/9/22 14:17, Nam Cao wrote:
> Re-write some code using memset to make it more obvious. Also remove an
> unnecessary volatile qualifier, because compiler complains about passing
> volatile pointer to memset.
>
> V3: get rid of "volatile" entirely, instead of just casting it away.
> V2: re-write commit message because previous message describes a
> non-existent problem.
>
> Nam Cao (2):
> staging: vt6655: remove unnecessary volatile qualifier
> staging: vt6655: use memset to make code clearer
>
> drivers/staging/vt6655/desc.h | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists