linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] fanotify,audit: Allow audit to use the full permission event response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:50:18 -0400
From:   Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To:     Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] fanotify,audit: Allow audit to use the full
 permission event response

On 2022-09-09 10:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, September 9, 2022 10:38:46 AM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Richard,  add subj_trust and obj_trust. These can be 0|1|2 for no, yes,
> > > unknown.
> > 
> > type?  bitfield?  My gut would say that "0" should be "unset"/"unknown",
> > but that is counterintuitive to the values represented.
> >
> > Or "trust" with sub-fields "subj" and "obj"?
> 
> No. just make them separate and u32. subj_trust and obj_trust - no sub fields. 
> If we have sub-fields, that probably means bit mapping and that wasn't wanted.

Ack.

> -Steve

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635