[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 21:48:35 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>, jun.nakajima@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM
guest private memory
On 8/19/22 17:27, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:00:41PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Kirill A . Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:40:12PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If your memory could be swapped, that would be enough of a good reason
>>>> to make use of shmem.c: but it cannot be swapped; and although there
>>>> are some references in the mailthreads to it perhaps being swappable
>>>> in future, I get the impression that will not happen soon if ever.
>>>>
>>>> If your memory could be migrated, that would be some reason to use
>>>> filesystem page cache (because page migration happens to understand
>>>> that type of memory): but it cannot be migrated.
>>>
>>> Migration support is in pipeline. It is part of TDX 1.5 [1]. And swapping
>>> theoretically possible, but I'm not aware of any plans as of now.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/intel-trust-domain-extensions.html
>>
>> I always forget, migration means different things to different audiences.
>> As an mm person, I was meaning page migration, whereas a virtualization
>> person thinks VM live migration (which that reference appears to be about),
>> a scheduler person task migration, an ornithologist bird migration, etc.
>>
>> But you're an mm person too: you may have cited that reference in the
>> knowledge that TDX 1.5 Live Migration will entail page migration of the
>> kind I'm thinking of. (Anyway, it's not important to clarify that here.)
>
> TDX 1.5 brings both.
>
> In TDX speak, mm migration called relocation. See TDH.MEM.PAGE.RELOCATE.
>
This seems to be a pretty bad fit for the way that the core mm migrates
pages. The core mm unmaps the page, then moves (in software) the
contents to a new address, then faults it in. TDH.MEM.PAGE.RELOCATE
doesn't fit into that workflow very well. I'm not saying it can't be
done, but it won't just work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists