[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YxrORIJIyTvFH+0m@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 07:25:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
driver
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> Hi Dave/Greg,
>
> On 9/7/22 10:31 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:27:20PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Per TDX Module 1.0 specification, section titled
> >> + * "TDG.MR.REPORT", REPORTDATA length is fixed as
> >> + * TDX_REPORTDATA_LEN, TDREPORT length is fixed as
> >> + * TDX_REPORT_LEN, and TDREPORT subtype is fixed as
> >> + * 0. Also check for valid user pointers.
> >> + */
> >> + if (!req.reportdata || !req.tdreport || req.subtype ||
> >> + req.rpd_len != TDX_REPORTDATA_LEN ||
> >> + req.tdr_len != TDX_REPORT_LEN)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > You never verify that your reserved[7] fields are actually set to 0,
> > which means you can never use them in the future :(
> >
> > Please fix that up, thanks.
>
> Would you prefer a new posting (v12.1 or v13) with this change, or do you
> want to continue the review in the same version?
What would you want to see happen if you were a reviewer?
(hint, new version...)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists